Selection of field guides to flowering plants and conifers
The progression can be seen from tree floras such as Keay, Onochie
& Stanfield (1960-64), moving through intermediates such as Hamilton
(1981), Blundell (1987) and Hawthorne (1990) to the copiously illustrated
guides of Ribeiro et al. (1990), Gardner et al. (2000) and Monro et
al. (2001). The latter dispenses with descriptions and just provides
annotated line drawings of leaves. Digital photographs are quick and
cheap to take, but are expensive to reproduce and have not yet displaced
artists' drawings as the primary medium for illustration.
Many guides still use line drawings because they can more clearly highlight
diagnostic details, while some guides use both colour photographs and
line drawings, e.g. Gardner et al. (2000) & Evans et al. (2001). Another
trend is for the production of field guides to smaller groups of plants,
with taxonomists producing field guides as a secondary product of monographic
work, e.g. Farjon et al. (1997) and Timberlake et al. (1999). Multi-accesss
keys are increasingly used, and long dichotomous keys are being broken
down into small groups with fewer couplets.
The following short list of guides incorporate many of the more
influential ideas that have appeared in field guides over the last few
years and should provide some inspiration to field guide authors.
Ashton, P.S., 1964.
A manual of the dipterocarp trees of Brunei State.
London: Oxford University Press.
A comprehensive manual intended as an identification tool for
foresters and as the foundation of a regional revision of the
family. It includes systematic and field keys and detailed description
of field characters. The leaves and fruit of all species of each genus
are illustrated together to facilitate identification.
Blundell, M., 1987.
Collins photo guide to the wild flowers of East Africa.
London: Collins.
One of the best early popular photographic guides. It has thumbnail
descriptions to 99 families and over 1200 species, as well as over 850
photographs, and is produced in the tough, hard-back format
characteristic of Collins field-guides. There are no keys and the
descriptions and photographs lack sufficient detail for accurate
identification.
Coe, M. & Beentje, H., 1991.
A field guide to the acacias of Kenya.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
A well designed guidebook aimed at non-specialists, with useful
guidance on identification and excellent illustrations. Anyone
designing a field guide to woody plants of the seasonally dry tropics
should note the provision here of keys for all of the states likely to
be encountered, i.e. flowers without leaves, leaves without flowers
and neither flowers nor leaves. It also provides tables listing
species exhibiting particular armature, leaf gland and inflorescence
type.
Christophel, D.C. & Hyland, B.P., 1998.
Leaf atlas of Australian tropical rain forest trees.
Melbourne: CSIRO.
A herbarium reference manual. It is the only identification guide to
include x-ray images of leaves and complements an interactive key on
CD-ROM.
Evans, T.D., Sengdala, K., Vienkham, O. & Thammavong, B., 2001.
Rattans of Lao PDR.
Royal Botanic Gardens Kew.
A comprehensive field guide, including vegetative keys, lists of spot
characters, descriptions, maps, a checklist with synonymy of the
rattans of Indochina and notes on local names, habitat, phenology,
uses and cultivation. It is easy to use, well arranged and has high
quality photographs and line drawings. All the inflorescence drawings
are reproduced at life size, so unfortunately some are too small to
see the detail clearly. English and Lao versions are available.
Farjon, A., Perez de la Rosa, J. & Styles, B.T., 1997.
A field guide to the pines of Mexico and Central America.
London: Royal Botanic Gardens Kew.
A field guide derived from a taxonomic monograph and incorporating
full botanical illustrations by Rosemary Wise and a basic multi-access
key based on the number of needles per fascicle and the size of the
cones. This guide has a number of strengths including a useful
discussion of identification routes and characters, the illustrated
glossary and the excellent drawings. Anyone writing a field guide that
includes gymnosperms should find this book instructive.
Gardner, S., Sidisunthorn, P. & Anusarnsunthorn, V., 2000.
Field guide to the forest trees of northern Thailand.
Bangkok: Kobfai Publishing Project.
An innovative and copiously illustrated field guide, that packs
information about 880 species into its compact size. It includes a
dichotomous key to genera using leaf characters, a multi-access key
listing 38 field characters (of trunk, crown, bark, leaves, flowers
and fruit), comparative tables for families and difficult genera such
as Eleocarpus and Syzygium and subkeys to genera and species. 430 main
species are illustrated with a mixture of 4-7 photographs, line
drawings (leaves) and paintings (flowers). The illustrations occupy
two-thirds of a page so are small, but the reproduction is very good
and the descriptions are very detailed for a field guide. Excellent,
but more help could be given for identification in the absence of
flowers and fruit.
Hamilton, A.C., 1981.
A field guide to Uganda forest trees.
Kampala: Makerere University.
This is one of the few vegetative keys to include field characters
often considered by herbarium taxonomists to be too variable to use,
e.g. leaf dimensions, numbers of lateral nerves, bark appearance and
slash smell and colour. These are the sorts of characters used by
skilled tree spotters and should be incorporated into field keys. The
three sets of dichotomous keys and the illustration (line drawings) of
species in groups facilitates three methods of identification: using
the rough key to get to a group then skim through the illustrations;
working through the main key to a particular species and then refer to
its description and illustration for confirmation or standing at the
base of a tall tree with the special key and using bark and trunk
characters combined with leaf characters observed with binoculars. The
rough and main keys lead with leaf arrangement, and the main key is
divided into 13 subkeys to keep the maximum number of couplets down to
73. The special key will help users to find the correct fallen leaves
on the forest floor to confirm identification of a particular
tree. The accounts are arranged according to their vegetative
characteristics to facilitate comparison of similar species, and
common species are presented in large font and rare species in small
font. It is comprehensive and innovative, and should still be of use
anywhere in the mountains of central Africa.
Hawthorne, W.D.,
1990.
Field guide to the forest trees of Ghana.
Chatham: Natural Resources Institute.
An A4 sized guide to 660 species consisting of two keys based on
vegetative characteristics and including useful notes on identification,
comprehensive listings of local names and line drawings by Rosemary
Wise. The main key groups species according to leaf characters,
with similar species illustrated on the same page and the key incorporating
the descriptive text on the facing page. Some information is given
on flowers and fruit. Many of the vegetative details used are not
publicised in classical botanical literature.
The second, smaller key is to the 200 common forest species and
is based on bark, slash, trunk and crown characters. A section at
the back gives thumbnail colour photographs of the slash and bark
of some common species.
The guide incorporates the final descriptive text in the indented
keys, opposite the relevant drawings of the species in question.
Therefore, the meaning of all key questions usually can be checked
against the final species. Also, candidate species can be selected
by browsing the pictures; the text opposite the picture can be checked
for further details, but crucially, so can the staements about the
species in the key leading to the species. In this way, a combination
of identification by browing and use of diagnostic text is facilitaed.
Keay, R.W.J., Onochie, C.F.A. & Stanfield, D.P., 1960-64.
Nigerian trees.
Lagos: Federal Government Printer.
A good example of an old-style reference manual for foresters. The
dichotomous keys work well and lead with leaf characters and the
descriptions detail vegetative as well as fertile characters. The
taxonomy was revised and new species added for a second edition (Trees
of Nigeria. Keay, R.W.J., Oxford University Press 1989), but only the
first edition includes a numerical key to genera based on 16
vegetative characters that is still useful today. Also, some of the
rarer or smaller trees were dropped from the second edition, which is
frustrating for conservationist-minded foresters.
Monro, A., Alexander, D., Reyes, J., Renderos, M. & Ventura, N., 2001.
Árboles de los Cafetales de El Salvador.
London: Natural History Museum.
This field guide is innovative in several respects. The focus is
entirely on identification and most information superfluous to that
end has been stripped out. Annotated line drawings replace the more
traditional block of descriptive text with accompanying
illustrations. The illustrations are kept large by being arranged two
to a page, side by side (the book is wider than it is long), and the
thumbnail diagrams in the margin facilitate quick identification by
flicking. A diagrammatic tree-type key based on leaf structure and
arrangement leads to 8 sections (e.g. Group 1: simple, alternate
leaves with entire margins), each with a dichotomous key to
species. Most importantly, this guide demonstrates that by focusing on
leaf characters it is possible to produce a useful field guide based
entirely on illustrations and data that can be derived from herbarium
specimens. The guide has not compromised on specimen citations; their
inclusion is an acknowledgement that good reference specimens are an
integral component of the identification mechanism.
Newman et al., 1995.
Manuals of dipterocarps for foresters - Singapore.
Edinburgh Royal Botanic Garden & CIFOR, Jakarta.
The first in a comprehensive series of field guides to the
dipterocarps of Malesia, and one of the first field guides to be
produced in combination with interactive identification software
(provided on a computer disk with the book). The keys and detailed
descriptions emphasize vegetative characters and are illustrated with
line drawings. The leaves and fruit of similar species are illustrated
on the same page.
Poveda Álvarez, L. J. P. & Sánchez-Vindas, P.E., 1999.
Árboles y palmas del Pacifico norte de Costa Rica claves dendrológicas.
San José: Guayacán.
A useful learning aid for anyone wishing to obtain a good knowledge of
the tree flora. Invaluable for the area it covers and small enough to
fit in a pocket, all it lacks is illustrations. It consists of a
dichotomous key divided into subgroups, the largest for
simple-alternate leaves has 125 couplets. There is an additional
pullout flow-chart key to families based on vegetative characters and
designed like a tree. The branches represent characters and the leaves
are families and the principal diagnostic characters are shown.
Ribeiro, J.E. da S. et al., 1999.
Flora da Reserva Ducke.
Manaus: INPA/DFID.
A photographic identification guide to the vascular plants of the
Ducke Reserve near Manaus in Central Brazil, that packs about 2200
species into less than 800 pages. It including keys, descriptions and
copious colour photographs (showing bark, slash, fresh leaves, dried
leaves, flowers and fruit) and line drawings. It was expensive to
produce, but the result is an innovative and valuable contribution to
Amazonian botany. The structure of the book will encourage
inexperienced botanists to develop family recognition skills, while
experts should be able to arrive at an identification quickly by
skimming through the photographs of the relevant group. The inclusion
of photographs of dried as well as fresh leaves should please
herbarium botanists. The detailed description of identification
characters serves as a synoptic key to families. Each family is
described in detail and the flowers and fruit of representative genera
and species are illustrated. The species accounts are illustrated with
colour photographs of leaves and bark, and identification proceeds by
visually recognizing the correct species from the illustrations within
the genus or sub-group of related species.
Timberlake, J.R., Fagg, C. & Barnes, R., 1999.
Field guide to the acacias of Zimbabwe.
Harare: CBC Publishing.
An innovative field guide with full-page line drawings, dichotomous
keys, comparative tables and an emphasis on field
recognition. Although the guide is to the genus Acacia, the main key
starts by eliminating other plant groups with bipinnate compound
leaves. Other strong features include the comparative illustrations
showing the pods of many species together and the comparative
tables. The tables represent a character matrix (vegetative characters
as columns and reproductive characters as rows with species occupying
the cells) and a species matrix (characters as columns and species as
rows).